Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Keith Washington v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 18-40692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HARRY WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, GERALD RICHARDS, AKBAR SHABAZZ and others
Holmes v. Shabazz et al CASE TRANSFERRED TO TYLER DIVISION.
as 1:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Akbar Shabazz, Dan Rose, FNU Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Shabazz et al
as 6:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Akbar Shabazz, Dan Rose, FNU Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00531
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Kelly Strong, Brian Smith and others
Petitioner:
Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Lorie Davis , Vance L Drum , Deborah G Cockrell and others
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Keith Harry Washington
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Gerald Richards, Akbar Shabazz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Virgil G McMullen, Vivian L Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Dunn v. Jeffrey Catoe, et al
as 16-41081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN L. DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY CATOE, Warden, STUART CALHOUN, Assistant Warden, JOHN BECRAFT, Law Library Supervisor and others
Raheem Floyd v. Edward McMahon
as 16-6937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHEEM AKBAR SHABAZZ FLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, Sheriff and M. J. MOSALL
Shawn Dunn v. Jeffrey Catoe, et al
as 16-40415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN L. DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY CATOE, Warden, STUART CALHOUN, Assistant Warden, JOHN BECRAFT, Law Library Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
