Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02033
Petitioner: Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent: Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024ct03032
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02027
Petitioner: Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent: Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02013
Petitioner: Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent: Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BURKE v. LM RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 1:2023cv01123
Plaintiff: BRITTNEY JAZMINE BURKE
Defendant: LM RESTAURANTS, INC. doing business as CAROLINA ALE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Woodall v. Steellion, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff: Tevan Woodall
Defendant: Steellion, Inc. doing business as Big Al's Pub and Grubberia, Mariana Conti Schwartz and Matt Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02255
Petitioner: Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent: Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hall v. DAC Prison et al
as 5:2023ct03251
Plaintiff: Adam Wade Hall and Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant: DAC Prison and Raymond Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?