Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MARCHOWSKY v. ALDI, INC.
as 1:2026cv09191
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MARCHOWSKY
Defendant:
ALDI, INC. doing business as ALDI, JOHN DOE(S) 1-21, ABC ENTITY(IES) 1-21 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Bank v. Aldi, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00585
Plaintiff:
Marcella E. Bank
Defendant:
Aldi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Benson v. Aldi, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00058
Plaintiff:
Noel Andrea Benson
Defendant:
Aldi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Nolley v. Aldi, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06800
Plaintiff:
Muminah Nolley
Defendant:
Aldi, Inc. and Tempo International (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown v. ALDI Inc.
as 4:2026cv01983
Plaintiff:
Hali Brown
Defendant:
ALDI Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VERDESOTO v. ALDI, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv05562
Plaintiff:
ROSELIE VERDESOTO
Defendant:
ALDI, INC., JOHN DOES (1-5) and ABC COMPANIES (1-5)
Cross-Complainant:
ALDI, INC.
Cross-Defendant:
ABC COMPANIES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sue Kim v. Aldi, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2026cv04661
Plaintiff:
SUE KIM
Defendant:
ALDI, INC., ALDI Foods, Inc. and ALDI USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McDonald v. Aldi, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00344
Plaintiff:
Robert McDonald
Defendant:
Aldi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ALDI Inc. et al v. Roloff Digital Forensics
as 2:2026cv00181
Plaintiff:
ALDI Inc., Sodexo, Inc. and Sodexo Operations LLC
Defendant:
Roloff Digital Forensics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
