Cases 41 - 50 of 4,699
Cano Velandia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner:
DEISY ANDRE CANO VELANDIA, JHOSETH SNAYDER VARGAS-CANO, KENNETH M VARGAS-CANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pineda Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER PINEDA LOPEZ, BLANCA FLORES DE PINEDA, FREDY PINEDA FLORES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reina de Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1398
Petitioner:
ROXANA GUADALUPE REINA DE DIAZ, DIEGO ENRIQUE DIAZ REYNA and MATEO ALEXANDER DIAZ REINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Alexander v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Alexander
Defendant:
J. Lynch, G. Jones, Ponyay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edwin Garrison et al v. Riot Games, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garrison, Brandon Orr, Leandro Cabo and others
Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc. and North America League of Legends Championship Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Haight-Biehler, et al.
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
PIERRE SMITH
Defendant:
HEIDI HAIGHT-BIEHLER, Medical Doctor, BASS, First Name Unknown, HSA, Health Services Administrator, BULGER, First Name Unknown, MLP, Health Services Professional and others
Irvine et al v. University of Washington
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Alexander Irvine and Barbara Twaddell
Defendant:
University of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Clark v. GSL Properties, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Brooklynn C. Clark
Defendant:
GSL Properties, Inc., CBRF GWS Real Estate Services, Inc., One + Three Centerpointe Drive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Mancia-Espinosa v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner:
RUDY ALEXANDER MANCIA-ESPINOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Smirnov
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALEXANDER SMIRNOV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
