Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,699
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sanchez v. City of Fontana et al
as 2:2024cv03460
Plaintiff: Ariel Alexander Sanchez
Defendant: City of Fontana, Brandon Nicely, Jacob Rainey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz-Godinez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2641
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER DIAZ-GODINEZ and RITA GODINEZ ALVAREZ
Defendant: LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Charles Nelson Ammons et al v. Ian Parkinson et al
as 2:2024cv03229
Plaintiff: Charles Nelson Ammons, Bryant Miller and Alexander Volonakis
Defendant: Ian Parkinson and County of San Luis Obispo, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2473
Petitioner: CELSO ALEXANDER RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff: Tony Blackman
Defendant: J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02276
Plaintiff: Kristine Alexander
Defendant: Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rojas Ruiz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2398
Petitioner: YAMIL ALEXANDER ROJAS RUIZ, LESLIE ELENA RUFFASTO LIVIA and YARED YAMIL ROJAS RUFFASTO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. McCollough
as 24-2366
Defendant: ROBERT ALEXANDER MCCOLLOUGH and Robert McCollough
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03065
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?