Cases 11 - 20 of 850
Alexander v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos and Dana Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enriquez v. DHS Immigration
as 24-20035
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration Department, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and others
Aguilar v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Aguilar, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Johnson County et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ruben Alexander Gomez and Ruben Alexander beaGomez
Defendant:
Johnson County, Nurse Gloster, Nursing Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Matthews
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Shannon Alexander
Defendant:
Unknown Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallegos v. USA
as 7:2023cv00131
Petitioner:
Alexander Gallegos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Martinez
as 23-11210
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alexander Martinez
Alexander v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04411
Petitioner:
Roger Alexander
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Aleman et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Roger Heard Alexander
Defendant:
Jose R Aleman, Consuelo Benavides-Martinez and Nicholas R Pecot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
