Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SUTTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11002
Plaintiff:
TODD ALLEN SUTTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SUTTON v. ESTATE OF JAMES A. SUTTON
as 4:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN SUTTON
Defendant:
ESTATE OF JAMES A. SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
SUTTON v. BIRD
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN SUTTON
Defendant:
CHARITY S. BIRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUTTON v. INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
as 4:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN SUTTON
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUTTON v. MOBERLY et al
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN SUTTON
Defendant:
ROBYN L MOBERLY, LAURA A. DUVALL, BASIL H. LORCH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Mustafa Saddiq v. Amazon.com, et al
as 20-15934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUSTAFA RAFEEQ BARAZAHI SADDIQ, AKA Michael Allen Sutton
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, A corporation owned by Beezos, KINDLE DIRECT PUBLISHING, a subsidiary of Amazon.com, TONY SABLE, Customer Relations Specialist at Amazon.com/Kindle Direct and others
SUTTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv62940
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mustafa Saddiq v. Charles Ryan
as 19-70784
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA RAFEEQ BARAZAHI SADDIQ, AKA Michael Allen Sutton
Respondent:
CHARLES RYAN
Sutton v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00205
Petitioner:
Ray Allen Sutton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sutton v. Chicago Police Dept et al
as 1:2016cv02319
Plaintiff:
Allen Sutton
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept, Brown and Triantatillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
