Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Dennis Mazzetti v. Kara Wood, et al
as 13-2095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS MAZZETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
KARA P. WOOD, in her official capacity as Director of DCP&P, ALLISON BLAKE, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families, KATHLEEN A. LUCAS, in her individual capacity and others
KHALIL et al v. THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY ("DCP&P") et al
as 2:2012cv07284
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED KHALIL and SANDRA DAMRAH
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY ("DCP&P"), KARA P. WOOD, ALLISON BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAZZETTI et al v. THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
as 2:2012cv05347
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MAZZETTI
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY ("DCP&P"), KARA P. WOOD, ALLISON BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EXEL et al v. GOVAN et al
as 1:2012cv04280
Plaintiff:
MEGAN EXEL, DAVID EXEL, JOSEPH RADCLIFFE and others
Defendant:
NICOLE GOVAN, DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES (DYFS), JANAY TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MELLEADY et al v. BLAKE et al
as 1:2011cv01807
Plaintiff:
JOHN MELLEADY and VIRGINIA KEEFER
Defendant:
ALLISON BLAKE, KATHI WAY, DEBORAH WATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. BLAKE et al
as 3:2010cv05145
Plaintiff:
JAVON ROBINSON
Defendant:
ALLISON BLAKE , WILLIAM MAY , ANDRE CHANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banc of America Investment Services, Inc. v. Reich et al
as 1:2008cv00652
Plaintiff:
Banc of America Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Reich, Jr., Allison Blake and Sean Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
