Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rosales v. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
as 1:2026cv00456
Plaintiff:
Alma Rosales
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mendez, et al. v. United States Postal Service
as 25-6902
Plaintiff:
RAUL MENDEZ and ALMA ROSALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Mendez, et al. v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Alma Rosales and Raul Mendez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rosales v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv09915
Plaintiff:
Alma Rosales
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2021cv01895
Plaintiff:
Alma Rosales
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alma Rosales v. Idaho Department of Health and, et al
as 20-35668
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, MATT WIMMER, Medicaid Administrator and any other agents working in both the Medicaid and Food Stamp Benefit divisions, RUSSELL BARRON, Director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALMA ROSALES
Alma Rosales v. Idaho Department of Health and, et al
as 20-35101
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, MATT WIMMER, Medicaid Administrator and any other agents working in both the Medicaid and Food Stamp Benefit divisions, RUSSELL BARRON, Director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALMA ROSALES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
