Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jean Massie, et al v. Dept Housing, et al
as 09-1544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN MASSIE, SHIRLEY SOWELL, ALINE REID and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THIRD E HILLS PARK INC
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPT HOUSING and ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary
Jean Massie, et al v. Dept Housing, et al
as 09-1087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN MASSIE
Plaintiff - Non-Participating:
THIRD E HILLS PARK INC
Plaintiff:
ALINE REID, SHIRLEY SOWELL, YUGONDA ALICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPT HOUSING and ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
HOUSING PRESERVATION PROJECT and NATL HOUSING LAW PROJECT
GASKINS v. SANTORUM et al
as 2:2008cv01499
Plaintiff:
KONOTA A. GASKINS
Defendant:
RICK SANTORUM, RANDY VULAKOVICH, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE, MANOR COMPLEX and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sharon Chavis v. George Bush, et al
as 08-2559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ASHCROFT, is an individual and is the Attorney General of the United States, JOANNE BARNHART, is an individual and is the Attorney General of the United States, GEORGE W. BUSH, is an individual and is the Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant:
CNA SURETY, is a bonding agency also known as WESTERN SURETY, JACKSON HEWITT CORP, Tax Service, JAMES MCGREEVEY, is an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JAMES v. WALLS et al
as 3:2007cv00842
Plaintiff:
SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. WALLS, PATRICK J MONOHAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS LP v. JACKSON
as 1:2007cv00801
Plaintiff:
REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS LP
Defendant:
ALPHONSO JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
