Cases 1 - 10 of 87
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Zantac (Ranitidine) Products, et al
as 23-13339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
ZANTAC (RANITIDINE) PRODUCTS and SANOFI
In Re: Alton D. Brown v. , et al
as 23-1709
Petitioner:
ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Brown v. Zantac (Ranitidine) Products et al
as 9:2021cv81950
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
Zantac (Ranitidine) Products and Sanofi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brown v. Nieves-Brown
as 6:2019cv01385
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
Beverly Nieves-Brown and Beverly Brown-Neves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 19-1809
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR M. SANTOS, W. A. MYERS, JR., CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN R. BEABOUT
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Alton D Brown
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Daniel Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. Gary Lancaster, et al
as 17-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Debtor - Appellee:
THOMAS J. RUETER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
