Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ira- Garland et al v. Perez-Escalona et al
as 6:2023cv00175
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Juan Alberto Perez-Escalona, Quickx Transport, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Ira- Garland and Stacy Ira-Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Perez Escalona et al
as 6:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Defendant:
Juan Alberto Perez Escalona and Quick X Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Rodriguez v. Perry et al
as 1:2020cv01228
Defendant:
FNU Chavez, John Anderson, William P Johson and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2020cv00821
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tinsley
Defendant:
Jarrell Perry and Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Amtrak, et al
as 20-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PERRY, AMTRAK and C. CHAVES
Nelson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2020cv00132
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Nelson
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a/k/a AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
v. Nelson et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Christopher A. Nelson and National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a/k/a AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Tankersley
as 2:2019cv02435
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak
Defendant:
Ray Tankersley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Amtrak, et al
as 19-2103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PERRY, AMTRAK and C. CHAVES
In re: Rodriguez, et al
as 19-2098
Respondent:
AMTRAK, C. CHAVES and J. PERRY
Petitioner:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
