Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
American Council of Learned Societies v. McDonald
as 26-1996
Plaintiff: AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES, THE AUTHORS GUILD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: WILLIAM ENGLISH, in his official capacity as Acting Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES, UNITED STATES DOGE SERVICE and others
Urban Sustainability Directors Network, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 26-5264
Plaintiff: Urban Sustainability Directors Network, Agroecology Commons, Providence Farm Collective Corp. and others
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service and others
American Council of Learned Societies v. McDonald
as 26-1829
Plaintiff: AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES, AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, MODERN LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Defendant: WILLIAM ENGLISH, in his official capacity as Acting Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES, UNITED STATES DOGE SERVICE and others
The Authors Guild v. National Endowment for the Humanities
as 26-1832
Plaintiff: THE AUTHORS GUILD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ELIZABETH KADETSKY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, VALARIE ORLANDO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party: AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES, AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION and MODERN LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Defendant: NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES, WILLIAM ENGLISH, in his official capacity as Acting Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, UNITED STATES DOGE SERVICE and others
American Historical Association, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 26-5185
Plaintiff: American Historical Association and American Oversight
Defendant: Donald Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States and in his personal capacity, James David Vance, in his official capacity as Vice President of the United States, White House Office and others
DPM 933 v. Department of Government Efficiency et al
as 3:2026cv00741
Plaintiff: DPM 933
Defendant: Department of Government Efficiency, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION et al v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv01169
Plaintiff: AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Defendant: DONALD TRUMP, JAMES DAVID VANCE, WHITE HOUSE OFFICE and others
Petitioner: JOHN H. PAGE and DAVID KRUCOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Underground Railroad History Project of the Capitol Region v. National Endowment for the Humanities et al
as 1:2026cv00447
Plaintiff: Underground Railroad History Project of the Capitol Region
Defendant: National Endowment for the Humanities, Michael McDonald, Department of Government Efficiency and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
BRADLEY et al v. UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT et al
as 1:2026cv00950
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BRADLEY, KYLE ABBATTISTA, SHARLENE BAGGA-TAVES and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MARCO RUBIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age)
State of Washington, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 26-1429
Plaintiff: STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF OREGON
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, President, United States of America, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?