Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05026
Plaintiff:
Amy Wright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DUNIGAN v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS DUNIGAN
Defendant:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. GEORGIA CVS PHARMACY LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00176
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY STORE #4251, CVS PHARMACY INC., CVS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMY WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. PEORISON et al
as 2:2021cv00191
Defendant:
D. FIRESTONE, MYER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE R. GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00099
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAMARRON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00098
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE ZAMARRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANDLEY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DUAN PEARCE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOCKBEE v. WEXFORD L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00026
Defendant:
WEXFORD L.L.C., ARAMARK L.L.C., KRISTEN DAUSS and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOCKBEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2020cv00683
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, AMY WRIGHT, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Plaintiff:
PREVIS HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
