Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10975
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
VIVERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15687
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREA NICHOLE VIVERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayo v. The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division, Maurice A. Eggleston, Victoria Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Whitman et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eggleston Mayo et al v. Mayo
as 1:2018cv00879
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo, Andrea Nichole Eggleston, American Life Fund Corp. and others
Defendant:
Samantha Alexis Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Nichols
as 2:2017cv13883
Plaintiff:
Dawn Jones
Defendant:
Andrea Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv13881
Defendant:
Dawn Jones and Andrea Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mayo v. Whitman et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggleston Mayo v. Whitman et al
as 1:2017cv03786
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
