Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Company, LLC
as 23-2426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SME STEEL CONTRACTORS, INC. and CORE-BRACE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SEISMIC BRACING COMPANY, LLC and ANDREW HINCHMAN
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Greene v. Marvin Plumley
as 19-7286
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH M. WINGFIELD, Correctional Officer; Sgt., TIMMY CUTRIGHT, Correctional Officer 2, CECIL PRITT, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Greene v. Plumley et al
as 3:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Kenneth Wingfield, Andrew Hinchman, Timmy Cutright and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Plumley et al
as 3:2018cv00108
Defendant:
Sergeant Justin Close, Richard Gisell, Sergeant Kenneth Wingfield and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SME Steel Contractors et al v. Seismic Bracing et al
as 2:2017cv00702
Plaintiff:
SME Steel Contractors and Core-Brace
Defendant:
Seismic Bracing and Andrew Hinchman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Joseph Wood v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, THOMAS HARLAN, Capt. and others
Defendant:
NURSE, on Duty July 31, 2012 (P.M. Shift, Name unknown), TRISTEN TENNEY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES
Wood v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Wood
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Marvin C. Plumley, Thomas Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
