Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lamberton v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamberton
Defendant:
William Wolfe, Justin Taylor, Brittney Mang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walsh v. Gibbons et al
as 3:2016cv01409
Plaintiff:
John R. Walsh, III
Defendant:
James Gibbons, Trish Corbett, Margaret Moylan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Walsh v. Walsh et al
as 3:2015cv01103
Plaintiff:
John R. Walsh, III
Defendant:
Laure G. Walsh, Andrew Jarbola, Gene Ricardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Burrell, Jr. v. Patrick Loungo
as 15-1027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK LOUNGO, individually, RICHARD GLADDYS, individually, ED ADAMS, individually and others
TEMPLE v. COLEMAN et al
as 3:2012cv02615
Petitioner:
Dion A. Temple
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and Andrew Jarbola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEMPLE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv01800
Petitioner:
DION A. TEMPLE
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and ANDREW JARBOLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Oliver v. James McGrady, et al
as 12-4199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES V. OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MCGRADY, Superintendent, ANDREW JARBOLA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Oliver v. McGrady et al
as 3:2012cv01445
Petitioner:
Charles V. Oliver
Respondent:
James McGrady , Andrew Jarbola , Linda Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stepien v. Geroulo et al
as 3:2011cv02274
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Stepien
Defendant:
Vito P. Geroulo, Jamie Dench, Bernard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Scott Binsack, Sr.
as 11-1780
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: SCOTT J. BINSACK, SR.
Defendant - Respondent:
DA LACKAWANNA CTY, ANDREW JARBOLA, A.D.A., EUGENE M. TALERICO, A.D.A. and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
