Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Emerson v. Samuels et al
as 4:2014cv02359
Plaintiff:
Sherman Emerson
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Matthew Tussey, J Lotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, WARDEN JOHN CARAWAY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BOLDEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT, et al.
as 2:2014cv00068
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moon v. USA et al
as 3:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
USA, Wendy J Roal, S Julian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 2:2012cv00070
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, HARVEY G. CHURCH, CHUCK GILBERT and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carl McIntosh v. Julie Beighley, et al
as 11-1936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, ANDREW RUPSKA, Doctor, THOMAS WEBSTER, Doctor and others
KING V. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Defendant:
MARK ALLANSON, TAMMY BEDWELL, JULIE BEIGHLY and others
Miscellaneou:
SERVICE LIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
