Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dejon Clark v. Howard Harcha, III, et al
as 23-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPH CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTHONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
CLARK v. HARCHA, III et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gavin v. Serino et al
as 3:2021cv01690
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gavin, Jr., Michael Kassisky, Tracy Sokoloski and others
Defendant:
Janet M. Serino, Phillip Campenni, Gerald A. Stofko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv14667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. LUCAS
as 2:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant:
KIMBERLY ANN LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
LUCAS v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2014cv00360
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANNE LUCAS
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALMADGE et al v. BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01527
Plaintiff:
ALYNDA TALMADGE , JAMES DOUGLAS TALMADGE , ELIZABETH ANN LUCAS and others
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. , B&W TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMISON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05837
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMISON , EDWARD JARRELL , EDWARD JESSE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUCAS v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv61964
Plaintiff:
FOREST R. LUCAS, FOREST R. LUCAS, ANN LUCAS and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., MEXICO BRICK & FIRE CLAY CO., A.P. GREEN FIRE BRICK CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
