Cases 1 - 10 of 2,134
Stephen White v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1799
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WHITE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PHILIP JEDRZEJEK, BILL GOODWIN and others
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Anthony Quamaine Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BEY v. AMOROSO et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
RESHAN SAVAGE BEY
Defendant:
AYLSSA AMOROSO, SGT. POLICE OFFICER BRYAN CARNEY, ANTHONY MICHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
MITROS v. CASTILLO/MARR et al
as 1:2024cv05420
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
MELISSA CASTILLO/MARR, A. M. and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE BUENA BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
IN RE: ANTHONY YORGEY
as 5:2024cv01748
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY YORGEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
