Cases 1 - 10 of 720
Brewer v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Defendant:
William Burns, Stephan Breyer, Andrew Weissmann and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shelton Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05221
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Winterer v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Decker et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
ANTHONY RAY SCHULTZ, DECKER & WILLIAMS, LLC, KAREN KOPPEL SCHULTS and others
Cross Defendant:
Dale Conder and Key Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Huff-McKay v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2024cv05104
Plaintiff:
Anthony Huff-McKay
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Phan Khanh and Khanh Phan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
