Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jones v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Anthony K Jones
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anthony Dwayne Jones v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04904
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv01889
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Arizona, State of and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Calvin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Anthony Jones, Jr.
as 19-10322
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY DELBERT JONES, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. Berryhill
as 1:2018at00910
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jones
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Jones v. Darden
as 3:2015cv02022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reed Jones
Defendant:
M. Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv01134
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Calvin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05084
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Jones
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, John Aldana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tacoma Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv06065
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Jones
Defendant:
Tacoma Police Department, Kenneth P Smith and Henry Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
