Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Umana et al v. Prince George's County, MD et al
as 8:2023cv03208
Plaintiff:
Erica Umana, Erika Erazo Sanchez, Dayri Amaya Benitez and others
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD, Jason Ball, Joseph Mihanda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant:
Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Jackson v. Warden
as 8:2020cv01915
Defendant:
Warden
Plaintiff:
James Jackson, James A. Jackson, Travis Fullard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Warden
as 1:2015cv03518
Petitioner:
Brian Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. State of Maryland
as 8:2014cv03732
Petitioner:
James Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Young
as 8:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clifford Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Kawahn Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Corcoran et al
as 8:2013cv00213
Petitioner:
Clifford Anthony Jackson
Respondent:
Dayena Corcoran and Douglas F. Ganzler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Berger
as 8:2012cv02686
Plaintiff:
Clifford Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Stuart Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hargadon
as 8:2012cv02622
Plaintiff:
Clifford Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Edward R.K. Hargadon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Curry
as 8:2012cv02212
Plaintiff:
Clifford Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Samuel Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
