Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillips v. Sacramento Department of Child Support Services et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael St. Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Sacramento Department of Child Support Services, Lisa Smith, Merced County Department of Child Support Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Phillip Rose v. Warden
as 2:2022cv08155
Petitioner:
Anthony Phillip Rose
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01717
Petitioner:
Anthony Phillip Rose
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Pax Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anthony Phillips v. D. Melo Trejos et al
as 2:2017cv04673
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips, Sr.
Defendant:
D. Melo Trejos and D. Melo Trejos
Bradley v. Spearman
as 2:2017cv00828
Petitioner:
Anthony Phillip Bradley
Respondent:
Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris Anthony Phillips v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02279
Petitioner:
Morris Anthony Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Jumbo Bright Trading Limited et al v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08932
Defendant:
Does and Gap Inc
Plaintiff:
Jumbo Bright Trading Limited and Charles Anthony Phillip Pozzi
Anthony Phillips Cosme v. LASD/Chavez et al
as 2:2009cv02363
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips Cosme
Defendant:
Chavez, West, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosme v. LASD/Chavez et al
as 3:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips Cosme
Defendant:
Chavez, West, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
