Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Becton v. USA
as 4:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Antoinette Charmane Becton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MORENO et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
ALMA MORENO, AMINAH HAWLEY, ANNETTE KRAVITZ and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Chinivere v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Chinivere
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ranger v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Ranger
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Antoinette Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Nevels v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Marie Antoinette Nevels
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Antoine v. Kijakazi
as 7:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Renee Antoine
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Addi Kori, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Johnson
Defendant:
Big C Inc., Cory Headen and Addi Kori, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
