Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Aquil JohnsonIn re: Aquil Johnson
as 24-1481
Petitioner:
In re: AQUIL JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-1597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 22-2128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00516
Defendant:
Dr. Fernando Tejeda, John Wetzel, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Aquil Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
US v. Kairi Mugaddim
as 20-4603
Defendant / Appellant:
KAIRI MUGADDIM, a/k/a Kairi Aquil Johnson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JOHNSON v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2018cv01322
Petitioner:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2017cv00686
Petitioner:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2017cv00136
Petitioner:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 16-3100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
