Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Patent Group, LLC v. Aramark Corporation
as 2:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Patent Group LLC
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
VU et al v. W&D Apparel (Jordan) Corp et al
as 4:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
THUY THI VU, Phuong-Anh Vu, BOAT PEOPLE SOS and others
Defendant:
JAMES SHEN, LUONG NHU DUONG, VU THU HA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Hoffman v. Thaler et al
as 5:2011cv01083
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Aramark Corporation, Lieutenent FNU Baldey and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hoffman
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv03999
Plaintiff:
Alvin McDaniel
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Ben Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antigo et al v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2011cv00408
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Antigo , Eduardo Deytiquez , Roberto Verzo, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Michael V. Lombardi, U.S. Opportunities, LLC, Royal Hospitality Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gwynn v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
Steven Gwynn
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and ARAMARK Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. Holmes et al
as 4:2011cv03360
Plaintiff:
Alvin McDaniel, Jr
Defendant:
Ben Holmes and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Nabors Drilling USA LP et al
as 4:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Josaiah Bell
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling USA LP , Chevron USA Inc and ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lagrone et al v. Aramark Corporation
as 2:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lagrone and Cecil Lagrone
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
