Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Mayberry v. Pulley et al
as 3:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Nate Pulley, William Hyatte, Aramark Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ARAMARK SUPERVISOR and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turnipseed v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Barney D. Turnipseed
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services LLC and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIELDS v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
JACONIAH FIELDS
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, DEBORAH HALL and BRANDON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STACY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
BILLY STACY
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, MASON, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Defendant:
MATLOCK, T. TURNER, M. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEYLEN v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv02985
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, B. MILLER and A. COPELAND
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv01697
Plaintiff:
S. QADIR, M. LANE and M. AION
Defendant:
B. MILLER, ARAMARK CORPORATION and A. COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCK v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv01633
Defendant:
AMANDA COPELAND, ARAMARK CORPORATION and BRANDON MILLER
Plaintiff:
S. TUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman, Jr. v. Winnebago County et al
as 3:2020cv50147
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Winnebago County Sheriff's Department, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Coleman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
