Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Diaz-Rogel
as 23-1977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARMANDO DIAZ-ROGEL
Diaz v. City of Merced et al
as 1:2023at00029
Plaintiff:
Armando Diaz
Defendant:
City of Merced, Cody McComb, Nicolas Dejon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Diaz v. City of Merced et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Armando Diaz
Defendant:
City of Merced, Cody McComb, Nicolas Dejon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barry John Montgomery, Jr. v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv05645
Defendant:
Armando Diaz, Does 1 to 25, inclusive, Austin Embleton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry John Montgomery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02970
Plaintiff:
Armando Diaz
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB et al
as 5:2013cv04915
Plaintiff:
Armando Diaz
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A. and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oscar Diaz-Corvera v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73336
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARMANDO DIAZ-CORVERA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Lawrence Davis v. Leroy Baca et al
as 2:2012cv08703
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Armando Diaz, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Davis
Oscar Diaz-Corvera v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72766
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARMANDO DIAZ-CORVERA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Armando Diaz-Pedraza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73966
Petitioner:
ARMANDO DIAZ-PEDRAZA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
