Cases 1 - 10 of 945
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11171
Petitioner:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Respondent:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Arnold v. Texas Board of Pardons & Parole
as 1:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Mervyn Paul Arnold
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dale Arnold v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
DALE ARNOLD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Arnold Covington v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 24-10671
Petitioner:
ARNOLD A. COVINGTON
Respondent:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Arnold (PS) v. Colorado Board of Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Petitioner:
David Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Colorado Board of Parole, Colorado Department of Corrections, Director of Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold (PS) v. Shuster et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
David Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Doug Shuster, Colorado Department of Corrections Director, CDOC Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fox v. Fed Bur of Prisons
as 24-30051
Petitioner:
Arnold Eugene Fox, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Felipe Martinez
ARNOLD v. REGALE
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Respondent:
DENNIS REGALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanson v. Zwicke
as 5:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Tiffany Dawn Sanson
Respondent:
State of Texas and Arnold S. Zwicke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tijerina v. Arnold S. Zwicke, Guadalupe County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jessica Ann Tijerina
Respondent:
Arnold S. Zwicke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
