Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Macias v. Dept of Family Services
as 23-50540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arturo Macias
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Family Services, also known as CPS, also known as DFPS
Macias v. Lumpkin
as 23-20239
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carlos Arturo Macias
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Macias v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01161
Petitioner:
Carlos Arturo Macias
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macias v. Department of Family Services
as 1:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Arturo Macias
Defendant:
Department of Family Services, CPS and DFPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bernal v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv08014
Defendant:
Eve R. Berg, Joanne Person, Mirjana Nichiporuk Tolt and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maria Bernal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lisa Bernal v. Providence Health, et al
as 21-55661
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSICA BENTLEY, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, KATELYN MICHEL HICKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA M. BERNAL
MACIAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09036
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTURO MACIAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACIAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06378
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTURO MACIAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Macias Jaquez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60305
Petitioner:
DANIEL ARTURO MACIAS JAQUEZ, also known as Daniel Arturo Macias
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tiller v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2015cv00513
Defendant:
Canyon County , Kieran Donahue , Josette N Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Donald Tiller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
