Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRYSTAL v. PORSCHE OF DESTIN et al
as 3:2020cv05579
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GROUP INC and JEFFERY T CRYSTAL
Defendant:
PORSCHE OF DESTIN, OKALOOSA STATE ATTORNEY, OKALOOSA CRIMINAL COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Muhammad v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2020cv00109
Defendant:
State of Alabama, United States of America Inc., State of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Re El Amun v. United States of America Inc.
as 1:2020cv00668
Plaintiff:
Jaame Amun Re El
Defendant:
United States of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Dozier et al
as 6:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Clark
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felts v. Executive Branch of the United States of America, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00204
Petitioner:
Kevin Felts
Respondent:
Executive Branch of the United States of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniel Hargrove v. United States of America Corp., et al
as 12-12781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP., U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
