Cases 1 - 10 of 24
State of TX v. EPA
as 23-40306
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
United States Sugar Corporation, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-3292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ASST. SECRETARY JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
WaterWatch of Oregon et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2020cv00413
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and WaterWatch of Oregon
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)
Intervenor Defendant:
Chair Mike Grimm Oregon Water Utility Council and Oregon Farm Bureau Federation
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. ยง 1531
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-3500
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator, U.S. E.P.A., UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
SC Coastal Conservation v. Andrew Wheeler
as 19-1136
Undetermined:
NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, U.S. POULTRY AND EGG ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION, FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RYAN FISHER, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and others
State Of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-3564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE, on Behalf of the People of Michigan and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Chamber of Commerce, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-5038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
