Cases 21 - 30 of 45
WILSON et al v. RAM-T CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
CAMERON WILSON and TOMAYO SHEPHERD
Defendant:
RAM-T CORPORATION and DEBORAH TURNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH Q. MIRARCHIH LEGAL SERVICES, P.C. et al v. THORPE et al
as 5:2016cv06604
Plaintiff:
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH Q. MIRARCHI LEGAL SERVICES, P.C. and SILVER LEGAL SERVICES, P.C.
Defendant:
DALE THORPE, RENEE THORPE, HERBERT MCDUFFY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRAVEC v. BB&T CORPORATION
as 5:2016cv04847
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KRAVEC
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
YODER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv04721
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M. YODER
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ISMAE HERNANDEZ, STEVENS & LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRUETT v. SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA STRUETT
Defendant:
SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC. and BB&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CRONAN v. REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv06117
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CRONAN
Defendant:
REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORP. , BB&T CORPORATION , FINANCIAL ADJUSTERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SPENCER et al v. 84 LUMBER et al
as 2:2011cv01184
Plaintiff:
CORA SPENCER
Defendant:
84 LUMBER, WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, WEIL MCLAIN and others
Movant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LYTTLE v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA, L.L.C.
as 2:2010cv01376
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE LYTTLE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AT&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
PIONTEK v. BB&T CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02133
Plaintiff:
VICKI PIONTEK
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
