Cases 21 - 30 of 360
Jarrat v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2021cv01298
Plaintiff:
Casey Jarrat
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baines v. AT&T Corporation
as 2:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
Regenia Baines
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC, Sequium Asset Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jarrat v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2021at00664
Plaintiff:
Casey Jarrat
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01066
Defendant:
Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al v. Charles Yeager, et al
as 20-17253
Intervenor Plaintiff:
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
VICTORIA YEAGER
Cross Claimant:
CHARLES E. YEAGER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Defendant:
DE LA PENA & HOLIDAY, LLP, LAW OFFICES OF JOANNA R. MENDOZA, P.C., AVIATION AUTOGRAPHS and others
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, et al.
as 2:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Bowlin & Associates, Inc., Connie Bowlin, Lesser Law Group and others
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Victoria Yeager, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Intervenor:
Parsons Behle & Latimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ian Vianu, et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 20-15446
Defendant / Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IAN VIANU and IRINA BUKCHIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
