Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Palomo v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Defendant:
NFN Atkins and Floyd Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Crisanto Palomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arvizu v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv02152
Defendant:
Paula Blackmon, Paul E Ridley, Tennell Atkins and others
Plaintiff:
Cathy Cortina Arvizu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Atkins
as 4:2024cv03111
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Bernice Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Caldwell v. Caldwell- Atkins
as 3:2024cv01772
Plaintiff:
Shekaylan Caldwell
Defendant:
Daphanie Caldwell- Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Conley v. Dennard et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Natalie Conley
Defendant:
Brad Dennard, Michael DeWyre, Patty Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins vs USA
as 6:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Taitum A Atkins
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Atkins v. United Furniture, et al
as 4:2024cv00625
Defendant:
John Doe, United Furniture Industries, Inc. and Big Lots Stores, LLC
Claimant:
Jerald Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Tancredi v. Lara et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rosa Tancredi
Defendant:
Maria Lara, Gabriela Prado, Carol Lee Alvarez Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
