Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gatson v. South Carolina, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv00830
Plaintiff: Derrick Antonie Gatson
Defendant: South Carolina, State of, Civil Records Clerk of Court Richland County, Attorney General State of South Carolina, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emory Michau, Jr. v. Joan Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2265
Plaintiff - Appellant: EMORY ALVIN MICHAU, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: JOAN W. WARDEN, Paralegal, Ninth Circuit Solicitor's Office, State of South Carolina, individually and officially, R. WESTMORELAND CLARKSON, Asst Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, State of South Carolina, individually and officially, DEBORAH RJ SHUPE, Asst Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, State of South Carolina, individually and officially and others
Randolph Baird v. April Chapman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7462
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDOLPH STEPHEN BAIRD
Respondent - Appellee: APRIL CHAPMAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Respondent: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, HENRY MCMASTER, (actually named as The Attorney General of the State of: South Carolina, Henry McMaster) and others
William Fairey v. Secretary, Florida Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-7414
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM SMOAK FAIREY, a/k/a Doak Fairey
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Arthur Field v. Henry McMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR M. FIELD, PhD., KATHRYN TAILLON and T. BART KELLEY
Plaintiff: CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUNDING LLC, Jerry T. Saad, Receiver for Capital Investment Funding LLC
Defendant - Appellee: HENRY D. MCMASTER, Individually and as Securities Commissioner of South Carolina, WILLIAM JOSEPH CONDON, JR., Individually and as Assistant Securities Commissioner, TOMMY WINDSOR, Individually and as Securities Investigator and others
Green v. State of South Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00170
Petitioner: Ronnie C Green
Respondent: State of South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Attorney General, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Fairey v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01610
Petitioner: William Smoak Fairey, Jr.
Respondent: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Owens v. State of South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6468
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIE J. OWENS
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General, State of South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?