Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 31 - 40 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11948
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30152
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11907
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11724
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11712
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11712
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Concepcion v. Alves et al
as 1:2022cv11703
Petitioner: Raymond Concepcion
Respondent: Superintendent Nelson Alves and Attorney General Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bano Maza v. Riordan et al
as 1:2022cv11684
Plaintiff: Maritza Alexandra Bano Maza
Defendant: Director USCIS Dennis C. Riordan, Field Office Directo EmilyRose F. Costa, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv11667
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Capen et al v. Healey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv11431
Plaintiff: Joseph R Capen and National Association for Gun Rights
Defendant: Attorney General Maura Healey and Charles D. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?