Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vigoda v. Rosendahl-Sweeney et al
as 1:2021cv00182
Defendant:
William Lucero, Janet Lynn Rosendahl-Sweeney, Kim Ikeler and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Renee Zebelman Vigoda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maynard v. Colorado Supreme Court et al
as 5:2020cv01180
Defendant:
Jacob Vos, William Lucero, The United States District Court for the District of Colorado and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. State of Colorado, The
as 1:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Housing solutions of the south west, Cassie Meredith, Kim Branham and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Delgado and Ann Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hayner v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2018cv00750
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayner
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lornes v. Attorney Regulation Counsel, et al
as 17-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LORNES
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL, HILLEREY CLITON FOUNDATION - JANDOW, OLSIN, CSP Corrections and others
Lornes v. Attorney Regulation Counsel et al
as 1:2016cv02835
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes
Defendant:
Attorney Regulation Counsel, Hillerey Cliton Foundation - Jandow, Olsin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guinn v. Colorado Attorney
as 13-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL GUINN
Defendant - Appellee:
THE COLORADO ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL
Carrillo v. Romero
as 1:2013cv02728
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carrillo, Luis E. Gutierrez, Janett Pina and others
Defendant:
Douglas Leo Romero, Timothy Edstrom, Traci Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
