Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mark R. Becker, et al v. International Brotherhood
as 12-3846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark R. Becker, Richard G. Adams, Liphrino Alcenat and others
Defendant - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Gale Norton, et al
as 11-5328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Muwekma Ohlone Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior and Aurene M. Martin, Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs
AUREN v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57392
Plaintiff:
HENRY AUREN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Becker et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120 et al
as 0:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Becker , Richard G. Adams , Liphrino Alcenat and others
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120 and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Spinelli v. Alcasabas
as 2:2010cv05268
Defendant:
M.D. Aurene C. Alcasabas
Plaintiff:
Josephine Spinelli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
AUREN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42071
Plaintiff:
HENRY AUREN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Stockton v. Auren et al
as 0:2007cv00556
Plaintiff:
Roddie K Stockton and Roddie K Stockton
Defendant:
Jeremy Auren and Duane Siedschlag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Governor,State of KS, et al v. Norton, et al
as 06-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, KICKAPOO TRIBE OF INDIANS OF THE KICKAPOO RESERVATION IN KANSAS and others
Plaintiff:
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
AURENE MARTIN, Acting Assistant Secretary of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.