Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Chapman (PS) v. Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
James Chapman
Defendant:
Aurora Police Department, David Conner, David Galiagos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Deen et al v. Colorado Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01013
Defendant:
Paramjit Palmer, Colorado Supreme Court, Denver 2nd Judicial District and others
Plaintiff:
Mazen Kher Deen and Kher Mosque, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FoFana v. Polis et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Linda J. FoFana
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Department of Transportation, The, Department of Housing, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARMON v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG et al
as 4:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
JESSICA CARMON
Defendant:
CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, CITY OF AURORA, LAWRENCEBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crownhart v. Aurora Police Department
as 1:2021cv02472
Plaintiff:
Earl Crownhart
Defendant:
Aurora Police Department and Dorkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Aurora Police Department, The et al
as 1:2021cv02080
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Harris
Defendant:
Aurora Police Department, The, City of Aurora, T. Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Moody et al
as 4:2021cv03119
Plaintiff:
Devonte King
Defendant:
Brad Hays, Reed, Aurora police department wrongdoer(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eklund v. Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv03674
Defendant:
Denver Health Paramedics, Denver Police Department, Denver Health and others
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Ray Eklund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2020cv02489
Defendant:
Bookman Kelly J, Andrew (I) Chanos, Metz (I) and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
