Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Mayte Guerrero Avina et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2023cv10573
Plaintiff:
Mayte Guerrero Avina and Daniel Ortiz-Magdaleno
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Avina Lopez v. Garland
as 22-2075
Petitioner:
EDMUNDO AVINA LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
USA v. Hugo Pulido-Avina
as 22-50126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HUGO EDUARDO PULIDO-AVINA, AKA Hugo Eduardo Pulido, AKA Hugo Eduardo Pulido Avina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
