Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07703
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01938
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Smith et al v. Avina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00561
Defendant: Jesus C. Avina, Jesus Christian Alehandro Bandera Avina, MVT Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Gerard Smith and Dante Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2376
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Hugo Pulido-Avina
as 22-50126
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: HUGO EDUARDO PULIDO-AVINA, AKA Hugo Eduardo Pulido, AKA Hugo Eduardo Pulido Avina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04728
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04737
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Daucunas v. Mecca et al
as 1:2021cv01632
Defendant: Avina, Mecca, Miller and others
Plaintiff: John Daucunas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant: P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff: Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?