Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Stanislav Arbit v. Schneider Electric SE et al
as 2:2023cv10369
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Arbit
Defendant:
Schneider Electric SE, Schneider Electric USA, Schneider Electric IT, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 23-6983
Defendant:
ALAN ANDERSON, DESIREE ALLEN, SHANNON BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRENCE WILLIAMS and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Anderson
as 23-6178
Defendant:
ANTHONY ALLEN, DESIREE ALLEN, SHANNON BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, Sealed Defendant 2 and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Natha Group LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01074
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Natha Group LLC d/b/a Valentino's New York Pizza and d/b/a Valentinos Pizza & Grill, Aamir Aslam Natha, Shairyar Aslam Natha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aamir Shaikh v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2727
Petitioner:
AAMIR MOHAMMAD SHAIKH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AFTAB v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv03206
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
AAMIR AFTAB
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Aamir Hafiz-Thompson v. United States
as 19-1641
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aamir A. Hafiz-Thompson
USA v. Shahzad et al
as 2:2017mj03168
Defendant:
Fonka Arouna Moundih (2) and Raja Aamir Shahzad (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
