Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McClellan et al v. Bright et al
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Aaron McClellan and Jennifer McClellan
Defendant:
Charles Vernon Bright, Jordan Carriers, Inc. and Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
MCCLELLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32691
Plaintiff:
AARON MCCLELLAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLELLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24104
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AARON MCCLELLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.S., et al. v. SKAGGS, et al.
as 1:2016cv00384
Defendant:
REBECCA BRELAGE, EDWARD GEORGE BURGE, DAVID CERTO and others
Federal District Case) (1:14-cv-1681-SEB-DKL:
COURT OF RECORD
49D09-1410-JM-00864) (49D09-1509-JC-002845:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE DIVISION
Plaintiff:
A. S. and BRENT SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SWALLERS v. SKAGGS, et al.
as 1:2016mc00007
Counter Defendant:
REBECCA BRELAGE, EDWARD GEORGE BURGE, DAVID CERTO and others
Federal District Case) (1:14-cv-1681-SEB-DKL:
COURT OF RECORD
49D09-1410-JM-00864) (49D09-1509-JC-002845:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE DIVISION
Counter Claimant:
A. S. and BRENT SWALLERS
MAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2015mc00113
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE SARAH EVANS BARKER, CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Winders v. Zwicker and Associates PC et al
as 2:2013cv02049
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, PC, Donna J Smith, John Doe Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Richard G Winders
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MENENDEZ v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2011cv00361
Defendant:
JOHN BUSSING, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/STATE OF INDIANA:, ANGELA D. COE and others
Plaintiff:
RACHEL MARIE MENENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
