Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Howard v. Elrac, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10686
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahim Howard
Defendant:
FedEx Custom Critical, Inc., Mark Ferrari, ELRAC, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Leonard Mondile
Cross Claimant:
SNL Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Abdul-Rahim v. Unifund CCR, LLC
as 1:2022cv10417
Plaintiff:
Aqeelah T. Abdul-Rahim
Defendant:
Unifund CCR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lyle Heyward v. Heather Cooper, et al
as 22-3781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE M. HEYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER COOPER, in their individual capacity, CHRIS LAMBERT, in their individual capacity, JAMES HAVILAND, Warden, in their individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Rahim v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv03249
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Holden v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 21-1862
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and WARDEN ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP A. HOLDEN, a/k/a Abdul- Rahim Muslim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
