Cases 1 - 10 of 25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Karel Farahan, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham Farahan
ERNEST WHITELEY v. SIEBALT et al
as 1:2023cv02266
Plaintiff:
JEREMY DAVID ERNEST WHITELEY
Defendant:
SIEBALT, ABRAHAM and WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PERRY v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM PERRY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
EVE et al v. SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE
as 1:2020cv02036
Plaintiff:
KAREN BURKHART, SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT-MARY-OF-THE WOODS, INDIANA, ASHLEY K. EVE and others
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Misener v. Quality Correctional Care et al
as 3:2020cv00335
Defendant:
Dr. Tchapchet, Quality Correctional Care, Mary Loftus and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Abraham Misener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. USA
as 1:2020cv00140
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Abraham Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
