Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Layes v. Garland
as 24-1667
Petitioner: ABUL LAYES, MONOWARA BEGUM, TANJIA AKTHER TANHA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Al Nur Enterprise, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04947
Plaintiff: Al Nur Enterprise, Inc., a California Corporation doing business as Dollar Variety Store, Md Abul Kalam Azad and Md Mamunur Rashid
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Code Connect Solutions LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00650
Plaintiff: Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Code Connect Solutions LLC, Link Code Solutions LLC and Abul Q Ansari
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03941
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bashar v. Garland
as 21-6324
Petitioner: MOHAMMAD ABUL BASHAR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hasnat Rasel v. Garland
as 23-6044
Petitioner: ABUL HASNAT RASEL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nasir v. Khokon et al
as 1:2023cv02128
Plaintiff: Ahmed Nasir
Defendant: ABUL BASHAR KHOKON and Khokon Convenience Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00312
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Azad v. Agtmael
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff: Abul Kalam Azad
Defendant: Antoine Van Agtmael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?