Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Matsumoto, et al. v. Labrador
as 23-3787
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LOURDES MATSUMOTO, NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND and INDIGENOUS IDAHO ALLIANCE
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL LABRADOR, in his capacity as the Attorney General for the State of Idaho
Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner:
GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Garfield County, Utah, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner:
GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Matsumoto, et al. v. Labrador
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Matsumoto, Northwest Abortion Access Fund and Indigenous Idaho Alliance
Defendant:
Raul Labrador
Amicus Curiae:
Proposed Amici State of Washington et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fund Texas v. Paxton
as 22-50889
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity of Attorney General
Ken PaxtonIn re: Ken Paxton
as 22-50882
Petitioner:
In re: Ken Paxton
Respondent:
North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity, Frontera Fund and others
Dalton et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Zebediah George Dalton, Blueribbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Debra A. Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Petitioner:
Navajo Nation, National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0431 Antiquities Act
Garfield County et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Garfield County, Kane County, State of Utah and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Zebediah George Dalton, BlueRibbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and others
Petitioner:
National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
NORTH TEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND et al v. AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
as 1:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
NORTH TEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND and LILITH FUND FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY
Defendant:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
