Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ackley v. Trumbull County et al
as 4:2020cv01103
Defendant:
Paul Monroe, C.O. English, C.O. Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa A. Ackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackley v. Howland Township Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Sean Stephens, Jeff Urso, Jeff Edmundson and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa A. Ackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Bettendorf et al v. Lytle et al
as 2:2017cv00681
Plaintiff:
Tracy Bettendorf and Carey Ackley
Defendant:
Chester Lytle, Keith Washburn, Jeremy Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ressler v. Wallace F. Ackley Co et al
as 2:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
George Ressler
Defendant:
Wallace F. Ackley Co. and Equity Trust Co Custodian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Mohr et al
as 3:2015cv01999
Plaintiff:
William Robert Dixon
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Paul Guyton, D. J. Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forsythe v. T. Marzetti Company et al
as 2:2014cv01523
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Forsythe
Defendant:
T. Marzetti Company , Beth Ackley , Lowell Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Leroy Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Gary Mohr, Correctional Officer Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockshutt v Moore et al
as 2:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
John D Cockshutt
Defendant:
Johnson, Ackley, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cockshutt v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
John D Cockshutt
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, Ernie Moore, Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
